DOINK $DOINK
$DOINK tokenomics are designed to be boring in the right places: fixed supply, zero tax, no admin mint, and a simple 90/10 split between liquidity and a disclosed team wallet.
Core parameters
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Token name | Doink |
| Symbol | DOINK |
| Decimals | 18 |
| Total supply | 1,000,000,000,000 DOINK |
| Max supply | Same as total (no inflation) |
| Transfer tax | 0% |
| Buy / sell tax | 0% / 0% at contract |
| Mint after deploy | Disabled / none |
| Owner privileges | None (no pause, no blacklist) |
| Chain | Robinhood Chain (4663) |
| Contract | 0xcD8004979e400f982627173D9BdD1D9e059aC3D7 |
Allocation at deploy
| Bucket | % | Amount | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liquidity | ~90% | 900,000,000,000 | Seeded into Uniswap-style pool (ETH/DOINK) |
| Team | 10% | 100,000,000,000 | Disclosed cold wallet 0xC844baAC1B5f9F65B4c0895D9464343FFD6B3d44 |
| Stealth mint | 0% | 0 | No hidden mint path |
Why 90/10 instead of “100% LP fair launch”
Fully transparent 10% team allocation beats fake fair launches that hide insider wallets. Holders can model dilution from the team bucket instead of guessing. Liquidity-heavy supply is still the majority float for trading.
What tokenomics do not guarantee
- Price floors
- CEX listings
- LP lock permanence (always verify current LP status on-chain)
- Profit
Fees you still pay
Even with 0% token tax, traders pay network gas (ETH on chain 4663) and DEX pool fees (e.g. Uniswap fee tier configured for the pool). Those are market mechanics, not DOINK taxes.
Quick trust trio: verified source · fixed supply · disclosed team wallet. If any of those break on a fork or lookalike, walk away.
FAQ
Can the team mint more DOINK?
No. Supply is fixed at deploy with no mint path.
Is there a reflection or rebase?
No. Standard ERC-20 balances.
Where is the 10% team supply?
On the disclosed wallet 0xC844baAC1B5f9F65B4c0895D9464343FFD6B3d44. Treat any other “team” claim as unverified.